Paul L. Williams argues that Osama bin Laden wanted to conduct a nuclear strike against the U.S., with 7 to 10 strategic nukes set to go off in major cities at the same time. According to Williams, if bin Laden had wanted a simple radiological assault (via a tactical nuclear weapon), it would have occurred years ago. U.S. intelligence estimates that there are already up to twenty-four tactical nukes floating around the continental United States. Abu Mohamed el Masry Saad al Sharif has confirmed these details, implying that tactical nukes were smuggled across the U.S.-Mexican border with relative ease.
Still, bin Laden said that he wanted to kill ten million Americans, and this would require a strategic nuke. Williams states that six Pakistani scientists, including Bashiruddin Mehmood, were confronted by bin Laden about building such a weapon. It is not clear what sort of information was exchanged during the meeting, but Williams states that, in 1996, there were over seven hundred cases of nuke-related material purchases, all routed through Germany and directly into bin Laden's hands. This was discovered when, in 2003, a terrorist suspect named Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was arrested and had his laptop confiscated. It sounds almost too unreal to be true, but those may have been the plans for the "American Hiroshima", right there, on his laptop.
Adnan el-Sukrijumah was one of the individuals exposed in connection with the plan. A Guyanese nuclear technician and accomplished pilot, el-Sukrijumah is considered to be "extremely dangerous" by the CIA. Williams personal opinion is that el-Sukrijumah will play a role in the next attack.
The Islamist Fundamentalists have enough support to carry out their plan. Williams suggests that, by proclaiming to be waging war on abortion, liberalism, hyperconsumerism, smut and the rest of the "cultural pollution" that stems from the West, the jihadists have struck a cord with Muslim communities. According to Williams, 90% of educated Saudis between ages 19 and 45 support jihad and bin Laden. Wahhabi Islam, the religion of Saudi Arabia since 1932, may be part of the equation. Wahhabism is not one of the reformed versions of Islam that is liberal in its interpretations of the Koran and more friendly to democracy and Western standards, but what Williams calls a "radical form of Islam" that it is "known for its anti-American sentiments." Incidentally, in 2001, out of the 1400 mosques in the U.S., eighty percent of them were established and funded by Wahhabists. A survey by a Pew Research group found that an estimated thirty percent of the Muslim community in the U.S. is not against the idea of suicide bombings. Islam is also the fastest growing religion in the United States.
What is unfolding here is not only a power struggle between the leaders of the Islamic Fundamentalist political movement and the monied individuals who hold sway in the West, but also a struggle of ideals and social philosophies. The community roles and traditional values of Islam are the sort of thing that the proponents of liberal multicultural internationalism work night and day to deconstruct. A conflict is on the horizon but most people in the West are too busy making money to care; keeping the borders open, which allows Islamic terrorists to slide into the US, provides a flow of cheap migrant labor into the country and helps certain people to make money; exporting the crooked morality, smut, hyperindividuality and materialism (which is ruining the Muslim lands, as well as our own) helps certain people to make money; and seeing the world as an economic forum, with resources to be uprooted and people to be exploited, helps certain people make money. But tell me: who operates most of America's border-transcending smut industries and sells crooked morality and hypermaterialism around the clock? Who sends their businesses overseas to exploit foreign labor sources? It ain’t me. I’m not that "Fortunate Son.
